The axe falls - Instablogs
The axe falls
Vincent Van Ross , New Delhi: Dec 1 2008
Made Popular Dec 1 2008
India :

The axe falls
As the political fallout of the Mumbai terror attacks began, the Home Minister Shivraj Patil had to go. He seems to have exhausted all the nine lives of the proverbial cat.

An agitated Congress president Sonia Gandhi declared: “One thing we do know…we can no longer sit back and let these attacks overwhelm us.” She called for immediate and decisive action at political, administrative and local levels.

Party General Secretary, Rahul Gandhi, described the terror attacks as a slap on the face of the government. Cornered from all sides, Shivraj Patil offered his resignation owning moral responsibility for the lapses.

P. Chadambaram, who was the internal security minister under Rajiv Gandhi, has been named the new home minister. The prime minister Man Mohan Singh has taken over the finance portfolio.

The Maharashtra chief minister Vilasrao Deshmukh may be the next to go. The fact that he led his son Ritesh Deshmukh and Bollywood film director Ram Gopal Verma on a disaster tourism of the Taj hotel has not gone down well with anyone.

The insensitive and casual remarks by the deputy chief minister and home minister of Maharashtra, R.R. Patil, to the effect that these things happen in big cities of did nothing to help the situation. Why should R.R. Patil continue after this?

The National Security Adviser M.K. Narayanan’s resignation has not been accepted as of now. But, the UPA is apparently courting Brijesh Mishra, the former NSA under the National Democratic Alliance government who came out openly in support of the nuclear deal. Other bureaucrats who might be on the line of fire may be the Intelligence Bureau chief and home secretaries.

Scoring political points, the Bharatiya Janata Party spokesperson Rajiv Pratap Rudy described Shivraj Patil’s resignation as too little and too late. Ascribing the reason for the attack as a result of collective negligence of central government, he said it must go.

One wishes he spoke the same language when the Indian Parliament was attacked; when the Indian Airlines flight IC-814 was hijacked; when the Akshardham temple was attacked. The National Democratic Alliance government did not quit. The home minister, L.K. Advani, did not offer to resign. In fact, he went on to become the deputy prime minister.

I am trying justify anything. I am not speaking for anyone. But, such double talk must come to an end. If the government needs to go, the people will vote them out in the forthcoming elections. But, at least for now, help the government deal with the situation instead of finding faults with everything it is doing. We cannot change the government every time there is a terrorist attack.

We did not elect the opposition members to become a stumbling block for the ruling coalition. We did not elect them as opposition members. We elect every member to rule our motherland. If a party fails to win sufficient number of seats to occupy the treasury benches, it is their fault. For heaven’s sake don’t keep finding faults with everything that is happening.

You have to play a constructive role in nation building. Not a negative role as you are doing now. Your payments are also coming from the tax players’ money just as the members occupying the treasury benches. So, please give us our money’s worth.

Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
1 Stars
Gibson
Gwalior, India
We demand explanation from the govt that how are these resignations gonna provide us security. Just now I read a news which said that the similar threats are received for Delhi. What measures are they taking to prevent these attacks? Can they please come out of the fake politics and do something in real for the society and their citizen's protection.

If not, remove all their security for which we pay the money in the form of taxes.
1 Stars
Vincent Van Ross
New Delhi, India
That is the point, Gibson. All said and done, the security situation should improve. That is our main concern.
1 Stars
Shameem
Aligarh, India
People pay taxes for the upliftment of the nation as a whole and not just for the comforts of the politicians or the corrupted officials. Shame on all of you who believes that these are small incidents. Them what is big for you. Invasion over India? Highly immature statement.
1 Stars
Vincent Van Ross
New Delhi, India
I agree with you in toto Shameem.
1 Stars
Sanjib
new delhi, India
Matter is just who are the person use & abuse the power and previlage.Question arises in many fold but answer is very simple i.e.PUBLIC known as JANTA.Don’t get confused or disturbed.It is view which is 100% correct.
In a democratic set up Janta have all rights & power but while using it they go for Cast,Religion,Region,creed,nepotism,race nd other ghstly facinating approaches.So keeping their(Janta)considerations in mind they (elected one ) abuses the power.And results come out as Riot,terrosist attack,Scam(ghotala)& consiparacy against its own motherland and blood.
If these elected are abusing your faith they are right in their approach because you provoke them to do so otherwise people do meet the same fate as a rapist got in Nagpur court primises.
We are the people always have double standard and habit of double speak.We critise Batala house accident and appreciate action against Pragya.We do critical to demolition of mosque ,churches but never come out when temple is destroyed.After all these is our own which as as dear as our life.We never come out with one voice that we have to kill the evil and route cause of terrorism and corruptin.
So don’t get emotional.If we really want a nice,defined,pro humanity environment than please
Let us all wake up and make them feel that we are against of any misdeed which is against the humanity.
Jai Hind.
1 Stars
Vincent Van Ross
New Delhi, India
Thanks for your comments, Sanjib. But, I am perturbed to read your statement that ”we do critical to demoliton of mosque, churches but never come out when temple is destroyed.”
Would you please enlighten me on which temple has been destroyed after 1947 and by which community?
1 Stars
Sanjib
new delhi, India
Don’t get perturbed.Just look into the modern history of Afganistan,Pakistan,Bangladesh,you will found thousands of examples.Even in India(after independence) there are hundred examples.I never meant that these were destroyed by the people of another believe or faith but some time by the person of the same faith.For example Arya Samaj temple destroyed at Ranjeet Singh road of Delhi,many temples were flushed in Ahmedaba recently.These were either demolished in the name of beautification,development etc.but same yaardstick is being not followed in respect of Mosque,mazar or other religious structue.People do feel it is an appeasment.As a matter of fact we are abided by similar constitution so should apply it on everyone.Moreover,we are the son and daughter of India thus deserv equal treatment at every level.
Actually recentment starts when one have double standard or parametre.I have visited many countries and observed that they do deveopment work but execute only after gaing the respect and confidence of each faith.Transparent action always be holy.
My experience— you know that I am basically a student of archaeology.We visited world known famous temple of Dwarka.In this temple people of other faith is not allowed.But this temple required some conservation at that time say early 80s.Dr.W.A.Sidiqqi was with us as a senior departmental archaeologist.Orthodoxed opposed some peoples entry.But for your surprise orthodox agreed with the logic of Dr.Sidiqqui.He just told that temple is humane (classical texts describes temple as man form)and it is sick,it needs an urgent attention failing which it will collapse.What you will do with sick,he asked the gathering?People replied we will bring doctor for treatment.Than he told think in that way.We are the doctor, want to treat the sick .Everybody convinced and we carried out conservation work.
So we have to be fair and win the trust.
Hope you are fine.
1 Stars
Vincent Van Ross
New Delhi, India
Sanjib, Many thanks for your rejoinder. I not only know you as an achaeologist (you have been modest in calling yourself a student of achaeology) but also as a walking encyclopaedia of archaeology and museuology.
I totally agree with you that everybody should be treated equal and there should be no appeasement. However, the problem with our eyes is that they can see the whole world but they cannot see themselves.
If a religious structure has to be brought down for a logical reason or for a project involving national interest such as construction of roads, flyovers, bridges, dams etc., the religion or religious denomination to whom the structure belongs should not be a consideration. However, it places huge responsibilities on the shoulders of the incumbent government to ensure that projects are not drawn up with the ulterior motive of dismantling a religious structure for whatever reasons. And, this should be followed in letter and spirit without discrimination. Also, when a legal structure is brought down for such a purpose the community needs to be sufficiently compensated and also provided an alternate site in the vicinity to raise a similar structure.
Coming to the point of equality, I would like to raise two points purely from the academic point of view.
I cannot speak for other religions but I think that every church is built on a legally acquired piece of land and the church would be in possession of the documents of its legal ownership and receipts for payments made by it. Can you say that of all the religious structures that exist in India. If an illegal religious structure is brought brought down members of that religion must have the magnanimity to acknowledge this. But, this never happens. So, who is being appeased?
The other thing is, you yourself cited the example of how an eminent archaeologist of Dr. W.A. Sidiqqi’s standing was being prevented from entering the temple of Dwarka even for the purpose of conservation. If my knowledge serves me right, there are only a couple of religions that discriminate between individuals; there are only a couple of religions that prevent people belonging to other faith and other denominations of the same faith from entering their temples. As far as I know, the temples of all other faiths welcome people from other faiths with open arms. So, the religious heads of these religions need to do some introspection and change things. A man should not be allowed to prevent the entry of another man into the temple when god has no problems. If we cannot have equality in the twentyfirst century, we may never be able to have it.
1 Stars
It is in fact too late...
I don’t mean that the change will turn everything around. P Chidambaram is himself exhausted by the economic crisis...

But yes it was necessary because Patil was a remarkably passive man whose mere appearance was enough to dishearten everyone. He even lost the elections and became a minister only due to his sycophancy towards ”The Family”...
Let’s hope PC would at least infuse some enthusiasm if nothing else...
1 Stars
Vincent Van Ross
New Delhi, India
Jitaditya, Shivraj Patil is a man of integrity and dignity. His performance was exemplary as the speaker of Lok Sabha. Somehow, he did not fit into the home portfolio. I think it is in recognition of this fact that the high command finally felt compelled to call for his resignation. I think it would be wrong to call him a sycophant.
Usually, such a change of guard would make no difference as we have seen in the past. But, this time the magnitude of the attack is so vast that things just have to change. This is a watershed. So, this had better be a turning point.
1 Stars
@Vincent
I don’t really think Patil deserves so much sympathy. The fact that he is a sycophant became clear in his statements made as reply to criticisms in previous blasts.
Why do you think a person who lost election was given such an important post?
1 Stars
Vincent Van Ross
New Delhi, India
Jitaditya,
I am not questioning your wisdom. I have watched him for a long time and he commands my respect as a person. I acknowledge that he failed as a home minister. A feel sorry to say this but we do not have too many politicians in India with integrity. I think that is what got him the portfolio not sychophancy. I will not argue with you if you hold a different view. But, this is my considered opinion. I would not stick out my neck for many other politicians.
1 Stars
Vincent Van Ross
New Delhi, India
Sanjib,
Thanks for sharing so much of information.
1 Stars
Sanjib
new delhi, India
Dear Vincent, Thanks for your nice word. You have raised certain points and certainly it need reply supported by basic historical facts. Before we should enter in the historical arena we must keep in our mind the complexity of Indian sub-continent.I am not only talking about area,people,caste,creed,religion etc.but want to say that we must know the Sect and Sept.There are a lot of variation in performances and philosophy in every society and clan.It made more complexed and confusing due to religious conversons.People have faith in one but practices other.But we should follow -”kabira khara bazar me sabki mange khair”. For example the Rigveda which is considered as the oldest book in the world perponded certain thoughts as a guideline for entire humanity– 1.Atmavat sarva bhuteshu (every soul is as good as your own soul) 2.Matrivata pardareshu     ( women should be treated as mother) 3.Par dravyeshu lostavata  (the wealth of other shoul be treated as brick bat) Further the Upnishadas and Puranas gave the basic concept of Vasudhaib kutumbkam - the fellow citizen of the world is member of your own family. So those who don’t follow the above doctrine it means that he/she don’t know the basic.These ignorant people of every faith are the root cause of anarchy,terrorism,mistrust.So evil lies here. 2nd question that is erection of the religious structure at different places.India is having a very long and continious history and the people were following different legasy and have seen a lot of system of governance,faith and guidelines so what we find today is ’khichari’ i.e.mixture.For your surprise in the early days Bible in Goa was known as Khristian Purana, it is well recorded in the Portugese archival records. There specific guidelines (related classical text) are there when,why and where the religious structures are to be rected.It is open secret that selfish and vested interest play their card in the shadow of religious sentiments.They don’t have respect for their own faith but they use it for personal gain.The famous poet Kabir was critical about it and had composed many verses.One of them is –”guna na hirano gun gahak hirano hai”.Every thing is there but due to ill knowledge people are ignorant.Even enlightened people are discarded by the system thus the entire world is facing this sad and ugly face of terrorism. Let us introspect ourselvs. Sanjib
Add your Comment